On objectivity and being a raving fangirl

[squeequeg]

Saw two movies that I'd been looking forward to for quite a while this weekend. Mirromask Friday, Serenity Sunday. Both were beautiful, and I'll happily see them again (and again, and buy the DVDs, and make Mom and Dad watch Serenity at Christmas...) but I'm wondering if my reactions have been colored a bit by my being such a fangirl.

Mirrormask was lovely and fascinating, as I'd expected. But there were a few weaknesses in plot (someone referred to it as basic young-adult plot, and there's some elements of that), and I thought that it was a little rushed in places. Granted, that may be because I have the illustrated script and so know a few of the scenes that were cut. (I thought a fraction more time on the whole future fruit bit would have made it seem less like an interruption, but then again, maybe they were trying to keep the pace unbroken.)

The thing is, because it was beautiful, and because I have a soft spot for Gaiman/McKean/anything out of the Henson studio, I'm more forgiving of its flaws. I tend to be like this when it comes to certain movies; I was more forgiving of Howl's Moving Castle because I love Miyazaki (and am only recently a fan of Diana Wynne Jones). I had some difficulties with certain scenes in Return of the King, but because I was already worshiping at the feet of Peter Jackson, was willing to put them aside and get swept along.

I'm having the opposite trouble with Serenity.

Not that I wasn't swept along. I went in with somewhat muted expectations, because I had originally had such high hopes and those always sting worse when they're dashed. It would be easier for me to have lower expectations if this movie turned out not to be so good.

It met those expectations, met the higher ones, and dragged me along for the ride. It was fantastic. And yet I feel ambiguous about it, mournful even. Because that sonofabitch Whedon killed off my two favorite characters. What's even worse is that after the death of the first one, I thought it would be okay, since I'd had bad feelings about the second one, had the feeling that he wasn't safe. Then wham! and he's dead.

I know they're just fictional characters. But it hurt a hell of a lot to see the two characters that either fascinated me or made the show that much better killed. And because this is Whedon, we're not likely to see either again aside from flashback.

I could go into some of the ideas I had after the movie (I am now certain I know what Book was before he became a shepherd, and I foresee a similar fate for the Operative) but thinking about it just makes me sad. My fangirl instincts are, in this case, keeping me from enjoying the helluva ride that Serenity was.

Weird. But I'm not about to stop geeking out about everything.

Comments

[ethicsgradient.livejournal.com]

Split these into two comments since I want to keep threads that they spawn separate:

I loved Serenity. This weekend was the second time that I saw it (went to one of the prescreenings) and while there are things that I didn't like, on the whole I thought it was amazing.

One thing is clear: this movie is serious, this movie takes no prisoners, this movie doesn't fuck around. You can substitute 'Whedon' for 'this movie' in that statement if you like. Book's death didn't shock me, as once he was removed from the crew (Book on the ship full time makes him harder to lose, book running some little podunk mission somewhere makes him eminently expendable) but Wash surprised me. Obviously both deaths are going to hit home with Firefly fans, but Book seemed to have been demoted to side character anyway....

Some people are going to yell about it I guess, we're unaccustomed to seeing major characters sacrificed on the altar of storytelling, but I think it made the movie better. traglar and I discussed this after the first time we saw the movie. Both of us believed that many more major characters would die. I honestly could have seen it going the route of "the message got out, but the whole crew had to die to achieve the mission." Whedon wanted to make this movie intense and a little stressful to watch, it think, and killing off characters that we felt were safe and were relatively attached to was an effective way (for me) to accomplish that.

This movie had an intensity that is uncommon, for me. It wasn't just sit back, relax, watch the pretty explosions and see the characters pat themselves on the back at the end of it.

I had a couple of plot problems (Mr Universe just felt a little silly to me, and too much of a plot bitch, and it seemed to me unlikely that the entire crew would leave the ship while on the surface of Miranda. Yes, you want them all to make that discovery together....but prudence should certainly have dictated leaving at least Wash behind in the event that they needed a quick rescue, a la the job that opened the movie) but overall, an excellent film. Yes, I would have preferred that this story arc be completed over the course of a few seasons rather than two hours, but I'm glad to get the sense of closure. The worst part of Firefly dying after half a season was the unfulfilled potential and the incompleteness of the story.

Now, for some of the other stuff you said...interesting idea that Book may have been an operative himself. The thought hadn't occurred to me. Not that we'll ever know now. Recall the exchange:

"Someday you'll have to tell me about how you know all this shit (or whatever he said)"
"No I don't."

It's an exchange between Mal and Book, but you can also look at it as an exchange between the fans and Whedon. He doesn't have to flesh that out if he doesn't want to, and he's not going to. (And, after the screening, in the Q&A session, someone asked the dude if we were going to get more of Book's story, and the dude said, basically, no.)

Finally, I don't understand the comment that your fangirl instincts are keeping you from enjoying the ride....care to elaborate more?

[stealthmuffin.livejournal.com]

Perhaps it's more that I'm not letting myself feel quite the rush I often get from really fun movies. Instead of being "yeah! woo! let's see it again and cheer them on and wheee!" I'm almost reluctant to see it again, just because it hurt to do so.

Yes, I know I'm getting hurt by the death of a fictional character. Yes, I know it's not my universe and I have no right to say what "should" or "shouldn't" happen. But it still hurt to see a character I cared about die like that. Because I took it so seriously, I can't treat it as just a fun ride; I got emotionally engaged. Perhaps too much.

[ethicsgradient.livejournal.com]

I'm definitely emotionally engaged...I won't fault anyone for beign emotionally attached to characters...it's not a good story if you don't get attached. I think the a huge majority of the storytelling that we encounter in our lives leads us to assume that primary characters are mostly safe. I really like it when that gets challenged, which is one of the reasons I like a certain series of books that is out there (and has the next book coming soon, thank god).

As for the "woo, let's see it again." I agree, this isn't one of those movies that you're going to get right in line to see again. It's too intense, and too emotionally draining. I walk away from this movie really affected by it, and I find that refreshing.

[kmunson779.livejournal.com]

Interestingly, I'm planning on going again later this week. I'm just thinking, since I picked up so much from rewatching the series, I'm expecting to get more out of the film the second time around. Part of this might be because I was in a group to watch the first time, and so part of me was keeping track of the other peoples' reactions to make sure they were having a good time, so I didn't fully catch everything I think I could have from the movie.

But, Art's heading out of town for a conference, so I think I'll either drag my mom to see it when she's in town this weekend, or go by myself on Thursday evening.

[stealthmuffin.livejournal.com]

Group dynamics do change how I see a movie quite a lot. I had to see Return of the King a second time on my own to be sure whether I liked it (yes, I did, once I was away from the caffeinated and adrenalin-hyped state in which I first saw it). I actually forgot that thomascantor had already seen it, and so there was a different interaction there as well.